CARDIAC BOOTCAMP
  • HOME
  • Course Login
    • Log In
    • Log Out
  • SYLLABUS
  • STORE
    • Online Self Study Course
    • Cardiac Video Course
  • ECG OF THE WEEK

ECG OF THE WEEK

BECOME A COURSE MEMBER
Each Week we put up one ECG case for you....because it's easier to learn from cases.
The ECG of the week is FREE to everyone. To become an expert at ECG's join the Cardiac Bootcamp Course. It's a great way to Learn!
​Or come to one of our LIVE Cardiac Bootcamps

The Last ECG of the Bootcamp Quiz

25/1/2023

0 Comments

 
Hello Everyone
As the dust settles from the last EMCORE Conference e and as we start to prepare for the next ones in Singapore, London, Bali and Fiji, there is one ECG we did not cover in the quiz, that is important to discuss.
​The ECG below was the last in the Quiz.
I did not give you a history at all, but that is the key here...diagnose with no history. I could add that this is a 67 yo patient with a presentation of SOB, chest tightness and palpitations.
Picture
What is the Diagnosis?
(a) Ventricular Tachycardia
(b) Hyperkalaemia
(c) Anterolateral MI
(d) SVT with Bundle Branch Block
The Answer is......
(c)  Anterolateral MI
It simply looks ischaemic
​The first thing to do is find where the QRS ends. See below.
Let's draw lines at where the QRS ends. This is the same process as we used in the 'Shark Fin' ECG (Blog coming next week).
Picture
When we do this we can see the ST elevation and the depression.
​With that marked, we see that it is an anterolateral MI. See below and watch the brief video.
Picture
0 Comments

A Patient with Atrial Fibrillation: Shock now?

1/12/2022

0 Comments

 
A 62 yo male with a previous history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation presents to the emergency department with a rapid irregular heart beat and a complaint of palpitations, that started 2 hours previously.
His ECG is shown below.
Picture
The patient is haemodynamically stable and is not greatly distressed by the palpitations. He  is not on any anticoagulation.
Here are some important questions to answer in relation to this patient:
  1. Do we shock this patient now, or give the patient 24 hours to potentially self-revert?
  2. We know that if we shock early, we are doing so, to a number of patients who would self revert. Should we send the patient home and get them to come back the next day?
  3. Are there any risks in waiting  for 24 to 48 hours, or is the risk of stroke equal during the first 48 hours?
​Watch the video lecture below for all the answers (From Cardiac Bootcamp).
0 Comments

Type II Myocardial Injury

23/11/2022

0 Comments

 
A 78 yo woman with known moderate coronary artery disease, (with no previous interventions) and a history of controlled atrial fibrillation, presents with left sided chest pain.
Previous history includes hypertension. She is on a DOAC, and metoprolol and Perindopril.
She is haemodynamically stable.
​The ambulance have given aspirin and topical GTN. On arrival she is pain-free.
Her ECG is shown below. 
Picture
Blood tests are essentially normal, however the high sensitivity troponin is 89 ng/L (normal is <14). Is this a type I or type II Myocardial Injury(MI)? Differentiating the two can sometimes be very difficult.
MI is now far easier to detect with high sensitivity troponin. Troponin are very specific for MI, however they do not really give us the cause.

Myocardial infarction is caused by coronary thrombus, however non-thrombotic causes also exist. Type II MI is due to a mismatch between oxygen supply and demand and is due to causes other than atherothrombosis including:
  • Coronary artery spasm
  • Coronary embolism
  • Coronary artery dissection
  • Other specific causes
    • hypoxaemia
    • anaemia
    • hypotension
    • severe hypertension
    • Brady/tachyarrhythmias.
Differentiating between subtypes, of which there are 5, according to the 4th universal definition of MI, can be challenging.

Mortality Outcomes
Both short and long term mortality is higher in type II rather than type I MI. Predictors of poor survival in those patients with type II MI include:
  • Older age
  • Female
  • Heart failure
  • Shock
  • The presence of CAD
Troponin
Those patients with Type II MI usually have a lower peak troponin level.
A 20% change in Troponin differentiates between stable and dynamic troponin patterns.
There are some recommendations that a 50% change in troponin should be used for dynamic change and a 20% change used when the baseline value is substantially elevated.

Differentiating between Types I and II can be difficult, however in general, if there are signs and symptoms of ischaemia, type I MI should be diagnosed.

These patients should all be admitted.

Reference
DeFilippis A et al. Assessment and Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Acute Nonischemic Myocardial Injury. Circulation 2019;140:1661-1678
Members go to the Video page and watch the lecture on Type II Cardiac Injury
0 Comments

An ECG Challenge: Is it VT or SVT?

2/11/2022

1 Comment

 
This week I wanted to ask you what you thought of an ECG. It was sent to me initially, with no past medical history for an opinion. It is of a 29yo with palpitations. That's all the info for now.
What does the ECG show?
What is the diagnosis? Is it VT or SVT?

Let me know what you think. Answers (plus more history) in next weeks blog, plus a simplified method of arrhythmia diagnosis.
Picture
My response to the ECG without any history was:
It is real ie not a mimic.
It is regular
The rate is faster than 120bpm, so we can consider VT. It is a little too fast perhaps at about 198, but can still be VT
The QRS width is just wider than 120ms ie., 124ms. It is a little borderline, but favours VT
There is no concordance
There is a dominant R wave in avR which favours VT
There is no AV dissociation that I can see
The morphology is RBBB with an Rsr which favours VT, also the R/S in V6 is <1 ( ie the QRS is entirely negative in V6)which favours VT.

Rx Cardioversion is probably safest. If not haemodynamically unstable, you could give adenosine. If VT, nothing would happen, if SVT will cause an AV block and may revert.
(Adenosine is also safe to give as this is a regular rhythm,)
I would add to this that there is a borderline left axis deviation

The rest of the story....

The history at presentation was that the patient developed palpitations whilst running. There was a long history of SVT, for which he had an ablation several years previously.
The cardiac history was more significant in that the patient had had endocarditis some 14 years previously. As a consequence there had been an aortic and mitral valve repair. Several years after this, he had an aortic root replacement.

The patient had attempted valsalva manoeuvres, with no success.
He was haemodynamically stable.
The patient was treated with Magnesium 5mmol, 500ml of IV fluid stat and Metoprolol and reverted to sinus rhythm.
​His ECG was shown below. It shows atrial enlargement with some inverted p waves in V2.
Picture

Comments

What are your thoughts? The chances are that it was probably SVT. Could it have been idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Cardiac Bootcamp Course members login to read all about this. This usually occurs in structurally normal hearts and doesn't respond to metoprolol, but to verapamil. 
​What would you have done?
1 Comment

The STEMI MIMIC

18/10/2022

0 Comments

 
I’ve presented the ‘Imposters’ before, Here is a case of a STEMI that’s not a STEMI.
At a recent Cardiac Bootcamp I spoke about the 4 things I look for in an ECG to help me determine if there are signs of ischaemia on the ECG.
 
4 Things I look for to RULE IN ischaemia on an ECG
  1. If there is ST depression in any other lead except aVR and V1, it is ischaemia
  2. ST elevation III>II is a STEMI
  3. QR-T Sign or convex ST segment it is a STEMI
  4. Are there Hyperacute T waves (“T wave towards over the QRS in V3 or V4): It is a STEMI  (check that it isn’t hyperkalaemia)
 
CASE 1(1)
A 57 yo male presents to the emergency department with central dull chest pain that started after going for a walk. There was no radiation but the patient had dyspnoea and fatigue. He had no past medical history and was on no medications.
He had a family history of his father having had a cerebrovascular event and mother a pulmonary embolism.
On examination he was afebrile, HR of 100bpm, BP of 102/60, respiratory rate of 22 and SaO2 of 95% on oxygen.
An ECG was done and is shown below:
Picture
WHAT DOES THE ECG SHOW?
Sinus Rhythm
Incomplete RBBB
ST elevation V1-V4
What's your diagnosis?
 
The assumption was an acute antero-septal myocardial infarction and the patient was taken to the cath lab.
Coronary angiogram showed: Normal coronaries. There was a small separate conus artery arising from the aortic root with embolic occlusion. However this was too small to stent. (The conus artery is usually the first branch of the right coronary artery, but in up to 50% can arise from a separate ostium from the right aortic sinus.)
 
An echocardiogram demonstrated normal left ventricular function, enlarged right cardiac chambers, with paradoxical movement of the interventricular septum and a right heart pressure of 40mm Hg and thrombi were seen in both pulmonary arteries confirming pulmonary embolism. He was then treated for this.
Ultrasound of the lower limbs showed a DVT.
 
The ST segments in the ECG normalised however the patient developed T wave inversion in the inferior leads.
 
WHY DOES THIS MIMIC OCCUR?
The cause is not really known although ST elevation in leads V1-V4 has been reported in the literature (2,3,4,5).
 
There are two theories:
  1. The right ventricle is very prone to ischaemia and doesn’t tolerate increased pressures very well. (read the Right Ventricular Spiral of Death). A pulmonary embolism results in sudden pressure increases in the right ventricle, that can result in both focal and global myocardia ischaemia. The ST elevation is due to epicardial or microvascular coronary vasospasm.
  2. A second theory relates to a catecholamine surge occurring with acute pulmonary embolism. This results in increased myocardial work resulting in ischaemia.
 
Conus artery embolism has been shown to cause ST elevation(6). Hence the possibility of paradoxical embolism must also be considered, especially if there is communication between the venous and arterial systems.
 
CASE 2 ​(7)
A 57 yo male presents to the emergency department following a syncopal episode at home. There was no prodrome. On awakening the patient had central chest pain and shortness of breath. The patient had a significant coronary artery disease history with previous cardiac stents. Past medical history also included hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and renal impairment.
He was afebrile, HR of 111bpm, BP 123/80 SaO2 96%
The initial ECG is shown below:
Picture
What does the ecg show?
Sinus rhythm 
Incomplete RBBB
Anterior and inferior T wave inversions.
Q waves in the inferior leads.
What is your diagnosis?
 
A second ECG was done some time later and showed the following:
Picture
WHAT DOES THE ECG SHOW?
ST elevation in the anterior and inferior leads.
What is your diagnosis now?

The patient was given GTN, following which the blood pressure dropped and the GTN was removed. Was this a clue that this could be right heart related?
 
An acute occlusion was suspected and the patient was taken to the cath lab.
Cardiac catheterisation demonstrated patent stents and no occlusive lesions.
Transthoracic echocardiography revealed right ventricular enlargement and displacement of the interventricular septum, with elevated right sided pressures and normal left ventricular function. Pulmonary embolism was suspected and a V/Q scan showed large bilateral ventilation-perfusion mismatches. The patient was treated for pulmonary embiolism.
 
 
CONCLUSION
We need to consider the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with ST elevation in the praecordial leads, especially if the history has elements relating to dyspnoea.
REFERENCES
  1. Goslar T et al. Acute ECG ST-segment elevation mimicking myocardial infarction in a patient with pulmonary embolism. Cardiovascular ultrasound. 2010 :50
  2. Falterman TJ, et al: Pulmonary embolism with ST segment elevation in leads V1 to V4: case report and review of the literature regarding electrocardiographic changes in acute pulmonary embolism. J Emerg Med 2001, 21(3):255-61. 
  3. Wilson GT, Schaller FA: Pulmonary embolism mimicking anteroseptal acute myocardial infarction. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2008, 108(7):344-9. 
  4. Lin JF, Li YC, Yang PL: A case of massive pulmonary embolism with ST elevation in leads V1-4. Circ J 2009, 73(6):1157-9. 
  5. Livaditis IG, et al: Massive pulmonary embolism with ST elevation in leads V1-V3 and successful thrombolysis with tenecteplase. Heart 2004,90(7):e41 
  6. Kagiyama S, et al Transient precordial ST elevation by a spasm of the conus artery during right coronary angiography. Int J Cardiol 2007, 116(2):e57-9 

JOIN CARDIAC BOOTCAMP
0 Comments

Ruling in Ischaemia on ECG

7/10/2022

0 Comments

 
At Cardiac Bootcamp we look at ischaemia on ECG and go over how to differentiate it from Pericarditis or Benign Early Repolarisation.

Follow these 4 rules to increase your chances of picking up ischaemia. See the examples below.
Picture
A 38 yo patient presents with chest pain. The ECG is shown below.
​Is this ischaemia, pericarditis or benign early repolarisation(BER)?
Picture
Let's answer the 4 questions. This ECG is not a straight-forward rule in.
  1. Is there ST depression in any lead other than aVR and V1
    1. There may potentially be some ST depression in III- This could be ischaemia
    2. There is also some PR depression, which may point to pericarditis
  2. Is STE III>II
    1. No
    2. There is some STE in I, aVL, II, V4-V6- Too many territories to be ischaemia
  3. Is there a QRT Sign or a convex segment
    1. No
  4. Are there hyperacute T waves
    1. No
This is probably not an ischaemic ECG. Can we rule in Pericarditis or BER next?
Changes that make Pericarditis more likely than BER:
  1. No fish hook, ie., J point, especially in V4
  2. (Spodick’s Sign: There is a downslope of the ST-T segment.)
  3. ​ST segment elevation/T wave in V6 is >0.25
Picture
The diagnosis is pericarditis.
0 Comments

The ECG in 20 Seconds Method

7/9/2022

0 Comments

 
I've been emailed a few times about the ECG in 20 Seconds Method. This is an approach to reading the ECG, I put together years ago, mostly to help myself read the ECG and not miss things. There is nothing new and groundbreaking about this. It has the elements of the classic ECG approach. Some say it is too simple, but that's its greatest strength!......
What is special about this method, is that it allows us to learn a basic algorithm, that looks for the most important ECG findings. You won't pick up everything with this, but you will pick up those important ECG changes that will have the highest yield for your patient, like the sneaky ischaemia, differentiating a lethal from non-lethal arrhythmia. It gives you the confidence to read ECG's.
Why did I call it 'ECG in 20 Seconds'? Because it only takes 20 seconds to pick up the abnormalities in the 
algorithm. You can then sit down and spend a few minutes sorting them.
​Below are the basic elements. For a more detailed approach login and go to the ECG in 20 seconds page.
Members can login and go to the ECG in 20 Seconds page for a more detailed review.
Picture
0 Comments

Chest pain history and the odds of ischaemia

1/9/2022

1 Comment

 
We look at a lot of ECG's and we do a lot of troponins, however the most important thing we are going to do in the patient who presents with chest pain is take a good history. Regardless of a normal troponin or a normal ecg, if the patient has a very good history for acute coronary syndrome, we have to admit that patient, or at least watch them and do serial testing. The low risk group that we clear with rapid rule-out criteria, are just that, low risk on history.

Here is an example of a patient who presents to the emergency department with chest pain. Please rank the following in terms of likelihood for predicting a myocardia infarction, or at least ischaemia.
  • Left arm pain
  • Right arm pain
  • Indigestion pain
Picture
ANSWER
  1. Right arm pain (LR 4.7)
  2. Indigestion pain (LR 2.8)
  3. Left arm pain (LR 2.3)
CASE
A patient presents to the emergency department with chest pain and you put a pre-test probability of x% on that chest pain being ischaemic. How does it change with the following? DOES IT INCREASE OR DECREASE THE CHANCE THAT THIS IS ISCHAEMIC PAIN?
PAIN RADIATES TO RIGHT ARM
ANSWER
INCREASES
PPV 34.6%
​LR 2.31
THE PATIENT HAS VOMITED
ANSWER
INCREASES
PPV 41.4%
​LR 3.09
THE PATIENT IS DIAPHORETIC
ANSWER
INCREASES
PPV 59.3%
​LR 6.39
The table below looks at the PPV and Likelihood ratios of predictors for AMI
Picture
Reference
Body R et al. ​The value of symptoms and signs in the emergent diagnosis of acute
coronary syndromes. Resuscitation 81 (2010) 281-286.
Members go to the Chest Pain and Troponin Section of the Course and watch the videos
1 Comment

A 6week old with irritability and poor feeding

21/8/2022

1 Comment

 
A 6 week old is brought to your rural emergency department with several days history of irritability and poor feeding.
On history there was poor/no antenatal care and the child was a home birth. On examination the child is afebrile, with a tachycardia and is haemodynamically stable. There is a 4/6 holosystolic  murmur on cardiac auscultation and bilateral lung crepitations.
An ecg is done and is shown below.  Please answer the following:
  1. What does the ECG show?
  2. What is the most likely diagnosis?
  3. What investigations would you perform?
Picture
WHAT Does the ECG show?
The rate is 138.
Normal P waves
The QRS's in V4-5 overlap, indicating a Left Ventricular Hypertrophy.
​This is most likely due to a Vetriculoseptal defect (VSD) 
WHAT is the most likely diagnosis
This is a VSD. VSD's cause a left to right shunt. Over time they result in pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular hypertrophy, which then reverses the shunt. This can lead to Eisenmenger's syndrome, resulting in cyanosis and heart failure.
At 4 to 6 weeks, the features of heart failure begin to appear.
what investigations would you like to order?
The diagnosis has almost been made clinically. We already have an ECG. We need a Chest-Xray, which may show cardiomegaly and a cardiac echo to follow.
Members please go to the paediatric ECG and Cardiac Conditions section
1 Comment

STEMI MIMICS

18/8/2022

0 Comments

 
STEMI mimics(1) are important to understand, because in taking the time to investigate the mimic, we can miss opportunity for early treatment of the real disease. Unlike STEMI equivalents, which have been covered previously, some of the mimics are not as serious.
​Here are some examples.

1. Normal ST Elevation

This can be in 2 forms, where in both the ST segment is concave:
  1. Male pattern: 1-3 mm STE in V1-V4
  2. Female pattern: 1mm STE in V1-V4
The formal definition of a STEMI as per AHA/ACC(2) is:
  • Men
    • < 40 yo: >2.5 mm ST-elevation in V2 or V3, 1 mm in any other lead
    • ​> 40 yo: >2.0 mm ST-elevation in V2 or V3, 1 mm in any other lead
  • Women: >1.5 mm ST-elevation in V2 or V3, 1 mm in any other lead

​The ECG below is from a male who presents with chest pain. It is normal.
Picture
(3)

2. Benign Early Repolarisation (BER)

This condition is present in a younger population group and amongst athletes. There are three types:
  1. Type 1: Pattern occurs in the lateral leads
  2. Type 2: Pattern occurs in the inferior/inferolateral leads
  3. Type 3: Pattern occurs throughout the whole ECG.
BER Pattern:
Point notch with elevation
STE with concave up morphology V2-V6, II, III, avF usually < 2mm
No reciprocal changes
​Symmetrical Concordant T wave
​STE/T-wave height <0.25 in V6

Benign Early Repolarisation may not be that benign, being associated with serious arrhythmias in some studies. 
Picture
BER Source: Cardiac Bootcamp Online Course

3. Pericarditis

Diffuse STE
ST/T-wave >0.25
There are 4 stages in pericarditis:
  • Stage I: ST and PR changes
    • Diffuse concave up ST segment elevation,
    • Reciprocal ST depression in  aVR. 
    • PR elevation in lead AVR + V1
  • Stage II: Normalisation of ST segments
  • Stage III: T wave inversions.
  • Stage IV: Normalisation of T waves
Picture
Pericarditis. Source: Cardiac Bootcamp Live Course
Picture

4. LBBB

ST-T and QRS discordant.
​STE is concave and <5mm

5. Hyperkalaemia

Peaked T waves
​Downsloping ST segment.

6. Brugada Syndrome

Type I: Coved Pattern
  • Leads V1-V2
  • High take-off > 2mm and concave downscoping ST segment
Picture
Type I Coved Pattern Brugada(4)
Type II: Saddle-back
  • Leads V1-V2
  • Minimum ST elevation
Picture
Type II Saddle-Back pattern Brugada(4)

7. Pulmonary Embolism

Can present with STE in Precordial leads
A more common presentation of right ventricular injury is STE in V1-V3 and/or ST depression of V4-V6.
Theories for why STE occurs in the precordial leads include:
  1. Paradoxical Embolism via atrial-septal defect or patent foramen ovale (5)
  2. Myocardial ischaemia caused by a sudden pressure load on the right ventricle, which is unable to compensate.(5)
  3. Hyperaemia from PE induces a catecholamine surge, increasing myocardial workload and ischaemia.(6)
Picture
(7)

References

  1. Wang K, et al.  ST- segment elevation in conditions other than acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27; 349(22): 2128- 35. 
  2. O'gara PT,  et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127(4):e362-425.
  3. ​Kayanı WT et al. ST Elevation: Telling Pathology from the Benign Patterns. Global Journal of Health Science. May 2012, ​4(3):51-63
  4. Mirijello A et al. Brugada electrocardiographic findings in an 80-year-old man. BMJ Case Reports. July 2013.​
  5. Cheng TO. Mechanism of ST-elevation in acute pulmonary embolism. Int J Cardiol. 2005;103:221-223
  6. Falterman TJ, et al. Pulmonary embolism with ST segment elevation in leads V1 to V4: case report and review of the literature regarding electrocardiographic changes in acute pulmonary embolism. J Emerg Med. 2001;21:255-261.
  7. ​Wilson G T et al. Pulmonary Embolism Mimicking Anteroseptal Acute Myocardial Infarction. JAOA • Vol 108 • No 7 • July 2008
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Author

    Dr Peter Kas
    ​Emergency Physician

    Picture
    Sign up for
    ECG of the week
     Its free

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020

    Categories

    All
    Atrial Fibrillation
    Atrial Flutter
    Atrial Tachycardia
    Axis
    Bradycardia
    Cardiac Arrest
    Chest Pain
    ECG Mimics
    Ischaemia
    Lead Reversal
    Pacing
    Paediatric ECG
    Paediatric Syncope
    Pericarditis
    QT Interval
    STEMI
    STEMI Mimics
    SVT
    Ventricular Tachycardia
    Wellens
    Wide Complex Tachycardia

Our Other Websites to Visit

www.emcore.com.au
www.resus.com.au

Contact Us
© COPYRIGHT 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • HOME
  • Course Login
    • Log In
    • Log Out
  • SYLLABUS
  • STORE
    • Online Self Study Course
    • Cardiac Video Course
  • ECG OF THE WEEK